I see the following messages in node’s output during startup and later:
2022-06-22 13:26:02 [PrimaryChain] discovered: 12D3KooWELsrpA6ddQnuEhvXdzvx3DVtpyYu2f1ZKw4vzD4y3zpj /ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/30334
2022-06-22 13:26:02 [PrimaryChain] discovered: 12D3KooWELsrpA6ddQnuEhvXdzvx3DVtpyYu2f1ZKw4vzD4y3zpj /ip6/fe80::e24f:43ff:fee6:d63/tcp/30334
2022-06-22 13:26:02 [PrimaryChain] discovered: 12D3KooWELsrpA6ddQnuEhvXdzvx3DVtpyYu2f1ZKw4vzD4y3zpj /ip4/172.17.0.1/tcp/30334
2022-06-22 13:26:03 [PrimaryChain] 🔍 Discovered new external address for our node: /ip4/212.248.62.42/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooWABba8yMXaWWV99ZCdqkXpjYsG3Ux9EuCb9ACf1pvd4so
failed to open /dev/dri/renderD128: Permission denied
failed to open /dev/dri/renderD128: Permission denied
Error while building OpenCL program:
<kernel>:1006:20: error: implicit conversion from address space "generic" to address space "private" is not supported when passing to parameter of destination type
vec_copy(x->v, a, sizeof(vec256));
^
<kernel>:991:52: note: passing argument to parameter 'a' here
static inline void vec_copy(void *ret, const void *a, size_t num)
^
<kernel>:1124:21: warning: initializing '__global uchar *__attribute__((address_space(16776963)))' (aka '__global unsigned char *__attribute__((address_space(16776963)))') with an expression of type 'const __global uchar *' (aka 'const __global unsigned char *') discards qualifiers
__global uchar* iv = _iv + x * 32;
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
<kernel>:1126:34: error: Explicit cast from address space "global" to address space "private" is not allowed
sloth256_189_encode((limb_t*)piece, 4096, (limb_t*)iv, layers, scratchpad);
^~~~~
<kernel>:1126:56: error: Explicit cast from address space "global" to address space "private" is not allowed
sloth256_189_encode((limb_t*)piece, 4096, (limb_t*)iv, layers, scratchpad);
^~
2022-06-22 13:26:07 [PrimaryChain] Waiting for farmer to receive and acknowledge archived segment
2022-06-22 13:26:07 [PrimaryChain] ⚙️ Syncing, target=#315686 (28 peers), best: #315679 (0x43a1…0b62), finalized #315578 (0x1790…eb99), ⬇ 147.8kiB/s ⬆ 28.9kiB/s
Is this a bug? Should I get rid of it in any way?