增加不同的Staking时间长度，作为获取奖励附加参数

Subspace Foundation Autonomys Improvement Proposals
1

AIP-0309：增加不同的Staking时间长度，作为获取奖励附加参数

Author(s)：
QingLizi

Created：
2025-03-09

Summary：
增加不同的Staking时间长度，作为获取奖励附加参数

Motivation：
Staking锁定的代币的时间越久 ，获得的收益比例就越高。中间不能解锁动用。这个提案主要解决代币的重复利用问题，减少已经发行代币流通，造成稀缺性

Specification：
增加Staking时间长度和获益分配时的基数
例如：
质押5年(100%)
质押3年(50%)
质押2年(25%)
质押1年(10%)
质押6个月(4%)
质押3个月(1.8%)
质押1个月(0.5%)
质押1周(0.1%)
质押1天(0.01%)

比如质押10000币为基准：
质押1天 则每天有1币左右收益。 合计365天为365币收益
质押7天 则每天有1.1币左右收益。 合计365天为401.5币收益
质押30天 则每天有2币左右收益。 合计365天为730币收益
质押365天 则每天有10币左右收益。 合计365天为3650币收益
。。。 。。。

技术上只要增加2个项目 一个是时间选择。第二个就是增加不同的收益基数 （时间长度乘以百分比）

Rationale：
1：项目已发行代币可以变为有实际使用价值的生产力工具。质押得越多 时间越长 获得的回报就越高 。
2：那些不想通过购买SSD获取更多代币收益的用户。就可以通过购买代币产生更多的利益。
3：时长上的选项增加。也可以让普通用户有参与和尝试的机会。比如1天。
4：更长时间的锁定使流通代币更具有稀缺性。

Risks and Considerations ：
风险很小 基本只要推出来就不会有用户排斥 适合自己的选项已经很多，每个用户都会为自己的曾经选择负责。
但是技术上有一定难度 无论从界面亲和力 和技术后台实施 都需要简单明了 操作简单易用 会需要更多的时间和团队技术力量

Implementation Plan：
首先需要在taurus测试网上增加时间长度选择。测试不同时间段质押是否可行。到期或者没到期的判断
然后再增加收益比例的乘法计算。比如乘以0.01%
最后就是收益的释放和Staking到期的释放。
不过好在有短时间选项。测试1天和7天就可以得出来结论其它时间有无问题

References：
作者原始创作，首次发表于autonomys BBS

2

LLM translation of the above:

AIP-0309: Adding Different Staking Durations as an Additional Parameter for Rewards

Author(s):
QingLizi

Created:
2025-03-09

Summary:

Introduce different staking durations as an additional parameter for reward distribution.

Motivation:

The longer the staking lock-up period, the higher the reward ratio, with no early withdrawals allowed.
This proposal aims to address the issue of repeated token utilization, reducing the circulating supply of issued tokens and increasing scarcity.

Specification:

Introduce staking duration options and adjust the base reward calculation accordingly.

Example:

  • 5-year staking (100%)
  • 3-year staking (50%)
  • 2-year staking (25%)
  • 1-year staking (10%)
  • 6-month staking (4%)
  • 3-month staking (1.8%)
  • 1-month staking (0.5%)
  • 1-week staking (0.1%)
  • 1-day staking (0.01%)

For example, based on staking 10,000 tokens:

  • 1-day staking → Earns approximately 1 token/day, totaling 365 tokens/year
  • 7-day staking → Earns approximately 1.1 tokens/day, totaling 401.5 tokens/year
  • 30-day staking → Earns approximately 2 tokens/day, totaling 730 tokens/year
  • 365-day staking → Earns approximately 10 tokens/day, totaling 3,650 tokens/year
    …

From a technical perspective, this requires adding two elements:

  1. A staking duration selection option.
  2. A reward multiplier based on the selected duration (staking length × percentage bonus).

Rationale:

  1. Issued tokens can serve as productive assets with actual utility. The more tokens staked and the longer the staking duration, the higher the returns.
  2. Users who do not wish to invest in SSDs for mining can generate returns simply by staking tokens.
  3. The availability of different staking durations provides entry points for more users. For example, a 1-day staking option allows casual participation.
  4. Longer staking periods enhance token scarcity by reducing circulating supply.

Risks and Considerations:

The risk is minimal, as users will have many options to choose from, allowing them to stake according to their needs. Each participant is responsible for their staking choices.
However, technical challenges exist, particularly in ensuring a user-friendly interface and smooth backend implementation, requiring additional development time and technical resources.

Implementation Plan:

  1. Implement staking duration selection on Taurus Testnet and test feasibility across different time periods, ensuring proper maturity and expiration handling.
  2. Introduce reward multipliers (e.g., multiply rewards by 0.01% per staking duration).
  3. Implement reward distribution and staking expiration mechanisms.
  4. Shorter durations like 1-day and 7-day staking can be tested first to validate feasibility before rolling out longer durations.

References:

Original work by the author, first published on Autonomys BBS.

3

I think there’s some confusion about how staking rewards are determined. The transaction fees in each block contribute to the reward pool, and those fees go to the operator (and their nominators) if they are the ones who process the bundle. For example, if someone has a one-day staking category, that operator (before paying nominators) might receive 0.01% of the reward—if that block even contained any fees.

But what about the remaining 99.99% of the reward?

Also, there’s no straightforward way to calculate a person’s rewards just by looking at the amount they have staked. The actual rewards depend on:

  1. The share of the total stake they have relative to others (since this influences how often they process a bundle),
  2. Transaction fees included in the bundles they process,
  3. Luck (in the sense of whether they get to process the bundles containing higher fees).

In short, the fees can vary depending on network usage, transaction type, and frequency, so it’s not simply a matter of applying a fixed percentage to a staked amount.

This Academy page should provide more detail.

我认为关于 质押奖励 的计算方式存在一些误解。每个区块的 交易手续费 都会贡献到奖励池中，而这些手续费会分配给 处理该捆绑交易（bundle） 的 运营商（Operator） 及其提名者（Nominators）。例如，如果某人参与的是 一天期质押类别，那么该运营商（在支付提名者之前）可能只会获得 0.01% 的奖励——前提是该区块中包含了交易手续费。

那么剩下的 99.99% 奖励去了哪里？

此外，仅凭质押数量无法直接计算一个人的具体奖励，因为实际奖励取决于以下因素：

  • 相对于其他人的总质押份额（影响该运营商处理捆绑交易的频率）
  • 所处理的捆绑交易中包含的交易手续费
  • 运气（是否能处理到包含较高手续费的捆绑交易）

总而言之，交易手续费的多少取决于网络使用情况、交易类型和交易频率，因此奖励并不是按照 固定比例 直接应用于质押金额，而是动态变化的。

4

这个提案只是一个添加乘法的基数。如果他获得了1%奖励。剩下的99%可以回归奖池 交给其它获奖者。或者直接燃烧掉。或者打入黑洞地址。进一步造成稀缺性

This proposal is just a cardinality for adding multiplication. If he receives a 1% reward. The remaining 99% can be returned to the prize pool and handed over to other winners. Or it can be burned directly. Or enter the black hole address. Further causing scarcity

5

I am not the biggest fan of burning tokens. In theory we could burn up every one of them at some point in the future.

You would also have to consider that the operator may have staked and un-staked various amounts over time and each of their nominators would have their own staking history. We also don’t really have a concept of a reward pool. This sounds like a pretty heavy engineering lift.

Your calculations are a bit off on the yearly rewards. The difference between 5 years (100%) and 1 day (0.01%) would be a factor of 10,000, not 10. So it would be more like 1 day = 0.001 tokens if 5 year was 10 tokens.

Personally I like the concept of rewarding people that stake for longer periods, and your proposal certainly is interesting. Unfortunately there are ton of nuances to calculating it - if it is even possible. At this late in the game, I don’t see any way of changing it before the staking rewards start.

我并不是 销毁代币 的忠实支持者。从理论上讲，我们未来某个时候可能会销毁所有代币。

此外，还需要考虑 运营商（Operator） 可能在不同时间 质押和解锁了不同数量的代币，而每个提名者（Nominator）也有自己的质押历史。此外，我们实际上并没有一个真正意义上的 奖励池（Reward Pool），所以这听起来是一个相当复杂的工程挑战。

关于你的年度奖励计算，有一点误差。5 年（100%）和 1 天（0.01%）之间的比例应为 10,000 倍，而不是 10 倍。所以如果 5 年质押 = 10 代币，那么 1 天质押 = 0.001 代币，而不是 0.1。

个人而言，我喜欢奖励长期质押用户的理念，你的提议确实很有趣。但不幸的是，计算它涉及大量细节——甚至不确定是否可行。而在项目推进到这个阶段，我不认为在 质押奖励正式启动前 还能进行任何更改。

6

当然。很多细节都需要考虑。这也是我最近几个月一直在考虑的。各种未知的变化。都需要考虑进去。
当然 每个困难都有变通的解决方案。不能因为一个困难 我们就不前进 不进步
1.运营商（Operator）注销 后： 用户自行操作转换运营商（但是不能提前解锁）质押历史保留（因为只用关注高度时间即可）。
2.奖励池（Reward Pool）没有 就可以直接打入黑洞销毁。这其实最好操作。
3.计算百分比我也不是很准确。因为只是初案。一旦提议通过。我会很仔细核对矫正。但是肯定是质押锁定时间越久。获得得奖励比例越高。
但是我初步看起来没错。5年质押 每天获得1代币/天 或者 1天质押 每天获得0.01代币/天

of course. Many details need to be considered. This is also something I have been considering for the past few months. Various unknown changes. Everything needs to be taken into consideration.
Of course, every difficulty has flexible solutions. We cannot stop moving forward and making progress just because of one difficulty

  1. After the operator is cancelled: Users can switch operators themselves (but cannot unlock them in advance) and keep their staking history (because they only need to pay attention to the height time).
    If there is no reward pool, you can directly enter the black hole for destruction. This is actually the best operation.
    I am not very accurate in calculating percentages. Because it’s just a preliminary case. Once the proposal is approved. I will carefully check and correct it. But it is certain that the longer the pledge lock time, the more. The higher the proportion of rewards obtained.
    But at first glance, I don’t seem to be wrong. Pledge for 5 years and receive 1 token per day, or pledge for 1 day and receive 0.01 token per day
8

是我表达错误了。应该是 5年质押 每天获得100代币/天 或者 1天质押 每天获得0.01代币/天

I expressed myself incorrectly. It should be 100 tokens per day for a 5-year pledge or 0.01 tokens per day for a 1-day pledge

9

这个提案我很早前就在DC或者用邮件沟通过。但是一直没有得到重视和通过。
也许确实在主网正式质押前无法完善它。那确实很遗憾。
所以请官方慎重考虑下我的建议。并集体讨论下可行性。如果可行就要乘早开始

I have discussed this proposal in DC or via email a long time ago. But it has not received attention and approval.
Perhaps it cannot be perfected before the main network is officially pledged. That’s really regrettable.
So please consider my suggestion carefully by the authorities. And collectively discuss the feasibility. If feasible, start early

10

在经济模型已经确定，并且已经在代码实现的情况下，这个建议在我看来不具有可行性，质押的激励来源就是个大问题，增发？可能会引来社区不满，如果不增发，币从哪里来呢？
锁定流动性听起来还可以，但需要更有创意的想法了。
With the economic model already established and already implemented in code, this suggestion doesn’t seem feasible to me, the source of incentive for pledging is a big problem, and issuing additional coins? It might attract community dissatisfaction, if not, where will the coins come from?
Locking in liquidity sounds ok, but it’s going to take a more creative idea.

11

它并不增发。奖励币的来源。和以前的来源没任何区别。以前是怎么来的奖励 现在仍旧是。只是收益会变小了。因为有了一个基数百分比% 。也就是：以前的收益*百分比 =方案实行后的收益

It does not issue additional shares. The source of reward coins. There is no difference from the previous source. How did the rewards come before? They are still there now. Just the profits will decrease. Because there is a base percentage of%. That is to say, the previous income multiplied by the percentage equals the income after the implementation of the plan

12

从频道里讨论的情况看，现在不能确定这个质押激励是多少，所以当下的问题是不是应该搞清楚当前的激励结构能不能吸引到人质押，不过好像没有太多人关注这个问题，比较尴尬。

13

显然提议人并不了解质押奖励的具体机制，此提案在技术上几乎无法实施，但是对自愿长期锁定的提名者给予额外奖励这个想法很有意思。
考虑到早期由于缺乏链上活动而导致apr会很低，缺乏对潜在质押者的足够吸引力，更好的办法是由基金会在早期对质押者进行额外的补贴（保证在前三个月APR>10%，前六个月APR>8%，不足的部分由基金会补齐，对于自愿长期锁定的可以给予额外津贴）。
初期的解锁量小于1亿，假设质押量为50%，补贴份额为50%，基金会最终补贴应该接近1.2M ai3，这个数量对于基金会所持有的份额来说并不算大。但是可以在早期吸引质押者，减少抛压，对增加网络安全和稳定市场有积极的作用

14

谢谢各位的理解和赞同。看来你们都看懂了。
我确实不懂技术，也是我关心不了的事情。但是现在不锈钢火箭筒都能上天发卫星和回收了。我相信技术是为了目标服务。
至于基金会是否会另外投入奖励给长期持有者。是他们的算盘。我们也不用操心。
但是目前这方案。肯定是对长期持有代币的用户有利。对短期持有逢高就卖的确实没什么用处。

Thank you for your understanding and agreement. It seems that you all understand.
I really don’t understand technology, which is something I can’t care about. But now stainless steel rocket launchers can be used to launch satellites and recover them. I believe that technology serves the goal.
As for whether the foundation will invest additional rewards to long-term holders. It’s their calculation. We don’t have to worry either.
But currently this plan. It is definitely beneficial for users who hold tokens for a long time. Selling at high prices for short-term holdings is indeed of little use.