Suggest canceling the development and actual deployment of ‘unauthorized operators’.
Reason:
Because in actual usage scenarios. Easy to be used by fraudulent websites.
Assumption scenario: He is building a traffic website. Even directly copying “auto-portal-web. vercel. app/dashboard” to create a similar web. or other website that attracts attention and traffic.
Then promote: I have an “officially licensed third-party” and “staking” entrance here. Welcome ai3 users to come and “pledge”
He can use high return rates to increase withdrawal speed and other methods to attract traffic.
Then, due to the inability of the end customer to distinguish, the ‘transfer’ was ultimately treated as a ‘pledge’.
At the moment when the user clicks on ‘authorize’ the wallet. The token was stolen by someone.
In summary, it is not only necessary to cancel the promotion/announcement of the phrase ‘unauthorized operators’.
It is also necessary to establish an official website to clarify and display the list of authorized nodes and authorized websites. For end-users to choose from.
This is a responsible behavior towards the end user. Make them not easily fooled. Ai3 was lost out of thin air.
I’m a little confused - do you mean our plans to enable “permissionless operators”?
If so, there may be a misunderstanding about what permissionless operators means. Operators process transactions on a domain and get paid fees for doing so. Currently there is an allow list on Auto EVM until we complete testing of features such as offlilne operator handling as part of Game of Domains. The removal of that allow list represents the point at which anyone can register an operator - permissionless operators. This is a fundamental way we ensure a resilient, decentralised set of transaction processors.
It sounds like you’re suggesting a fake/scam staking website could be setup which would be nothing to do with permissionless operators? This is the case for any project that uses staking which is why it’s so important that those who self-custody and embrace the concepts of web3 always do their research and ensure they know what they are signing before doing so.
Please let me know if I’ve misunderstood your concern.
Not everything. Others are doing it. We can do it this way. Or it is necessary to do so. For example, the “anti censorship content” I mentioned before. It’s just an example.
Of course, my ultimate demand is. Don’t spend any more time and resources. Above this’ open operator '.
I can already predict its future application scenarios.
Low returns "only come from XDM“
Easy to be exploited by fraudulent websites
If there is no subsidy for opening an operator node, the basic income will be zero and the popularity will not be high
It takes several months to fix a simple bug now. Too many resources are wasted. The usage scenarios are also limited.
If an operator behaves maliciously they will be slashed Domains | Autonomys Network so they are economically disincentivised to be untrustworthy. Or are you advocating to keep the allow list and adopt a committee style approach to the operator set?
My suggestion is: Don’t waste resources on ‘open operators’ anymore. Actually, those official nodes. That’s enough. No need to develop or test on Chronos anymore. Resources can be used for Android and iOS development.
Even XDM cross chain bridge EVM BNB can be developed and researched without wasting resources. More resources are being spent on the Subspace-Layer 2 blockchain. They are all more meaningful.